State v. Saddler
This text of 2000 Ohio 72 (State v. Saddler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 1222.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. SADDLER, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Saddler, 2000-Ohio-72.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 99-2084—Submitted September 26, 2000—Decided November 8, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 74218. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Randi Marie Ostry, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. James A. Draper, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Darin Thompson, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. {¶ 2} The court orders that the court of appeals’ opinion not be published in the Ohio Official Reports, and that it may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK, J., dissents. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 3} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 72, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-saddler-ohio-2000.