State v. S. O. C.

217 P.3d 691, 230 Or. App. 748, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1358
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 9, 2009
Docket060666031; A132892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 217 P.3d 691 (State v. S. O. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. S. O. C., 217 P.3d 691, 230 Or. App. 748, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1358 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is a danger to himself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the judgment of involuntary commitment. On de novo review,1 we agree that the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of appellant’s mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs or is a danger to himself. Accordingly, we accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Soc
217 P.3d 691 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 P.3d 691, 230 Or. App. 748, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-o-c-orctapp-2009.