State v. S. O. C.
This text of 217 P.3d 691 (State v. S. O. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is a danger to himself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the judgment of involuntary commitment. On de novo review,1 we agree that the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of appellant’s mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs or is a danger to himself. Accordingly, we accept the state’s concession.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 P.3d 691, 230 Or. App. 748, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-s-o-c-orctapp-2009.