In the Matter of Soc

217 P.3d 691, 230 Or. App. 748
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 9, 2009
Docket060666031, A132892
StatusPublished

This text of 217 P.3d 691 (In the Matter of Soc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In the Matter of Soc, 217 P.3d 691, 230 Or. App. 748 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

217 P.3d 691 (2009)
230 Or. App. 748

In the Matter of S.O.C., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
S.O.C., Appellant.

060666031, A132892.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on August 7, 2009.
Decided September 9, 2009.

Liza J. Langford filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Stacie F. Beckerman, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is unable to provide for his basic personal needs and is a danger to himself. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence to support the judgment of involuntary commitment. On de novo review,[1] we agree that the evidence is insufficient to establish that, because of appellant's mental disorder, he is unable to provide for his basic personal needs or is a danger to himself. Accordingly, we accept the state's concession.

Reversed.

NOTES

[1] ORS 19.415, which governs our standard of review, was recently amended by Senate Bill 262 (2009). Or. Laws 2009, ch. 231, §§ 2-3. The amendments apply to appeals in which the notice of appeal was filed on or after June 4, 2009. Because the notice of appeal in this case was filed before that date, the amendments do not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. S. O. C.
217 P.3d 691 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 P.3d 691, 230 Or. App. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-soc-orctapp-2009.