Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Russell

State v. Russell

117 P.3d 301, 200 Or. App. 725
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 27, 2005
Docket20-03-14609 A123638
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 P.3d 301 (State v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Russell, 117 P.3d 301, 200 Or. App. 725 (Or. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

117 P.3d 301 (2005)
200 Or. App. 725

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Christopher Lee RUSSELL, Appellant.

20-03-14609; A123638.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on Record and Briefs June 30, 2005.
Decided July 27, 2005.

Peter A. Ozanne, Executive Director, Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Anne F. Munsey, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the briefs for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and LINDER[*] and SCHUMAN, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed. State v. Perez, 196 Or.App. 364, 102 P.3d 705 (2004), rev. allowed, 338 Or. 488, 113 P.3d 434 (2005); ORS 138.222(5).

NOTES

[*] Linder, J., vice Richardson, S. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Russell
206 P.3d 219 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 P.3d 301, 200 Or. App. 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-russell-orctapp-2005.