State v. Russell
297 S.W.3d 149, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1878, 2009 WL 3817601
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Russell. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 400 →
Opinion
ORDER
Kimoni L. Russell appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 2000. In his sole Point Relied On, Russell argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction on a theory of accomplice liability. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting *150 forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Russell, 297 S.W.3d 149, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1878, 2009 WL 3817601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
297 S.W.3d 149 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.