State v. Russell

287 S.W.3d 709, 2009 WL 1372195
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Russell. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 400
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 19, 2009·No. WD 69852·Published

Opinion

287 S.W.3d 709 (2009)

STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Dennis L. RUSSELL, Appellant.

No. WD 69852.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

May 19, 2009.

Rosalynn Koch, Columbia, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, C.J., JAMES M. SMART, JR., and VICTOR C. HOWARD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Dennis Russell appeals from his convictions for three counts of statutory sodomy, section 566.062, following a jury trial. In his two points on appeal, Mr. Russell challenges the propriety of statements made by the prosecutor during closing argument.

For the reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).[1]

NOTES

[1] Missouri Supreme Court Rules of Civil Procedure (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Russell, 287 S.W.3d 709, 2009 WL 1372195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

287 S.W.3d 709 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christ v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District
287 S.W.3d 709 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)