State v. Russell

652 P.2d 203, 103 Idaho 699, 1982 Ida. LEXIS 294
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 1982·No. No. 14153·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The appellant appeals his automatic commitment to State Hospital South pursuant to I.C. § 18-214. The only issue raised by this appeal is the constitutionality of the automatic commitment procedures of I.C. § 18-214, as measured against the due process and equal protection guarantees found in the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, and Art.. 1, §§ 1, 13, and 18 of the Idaho Constitution. The appellant successfully asserted the defense of mental disease or defect in the proceedings below. In light of our decision in In re Downing, 103 Idaho 689, 652 P.2d 193 (1982), the order of commitment is affirmed.

McFADDEN, J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Russell, 652 P.2d 203, 103 Idaho 699, 1982 Ida. LEXIS 294 (Idaho 1982).

652 P.2d 203 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Collins v. Superior Court
723 P.2d 644 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1986)
Application of Downing
652 P.2d 193 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)
Carter v. State, Dept. of Health & Welfare
652 P.2d 649 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1982)