State v. Rucker
This text of 2012 Ohio 5633 (State v. Rucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Rucker, 135 Ohio St.3d 218, 2012-Ohio-5633.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. RUCKER, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Rucker, 135 Ohio St.3d 218, 2012-Ohio-5633.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of State v. Moore. (Nos. 2012-1097 and 2012-1218—Submitted December 5, 2012—Decided December 6, 2012.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 26212, 2012-Ohio-2176. _______________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part on the authority of State v. Moore, 135 Ohio St.3d 151, 2012- Ohio-5479, 985 N.E.2d 432. The cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing regarding the mandatory fine. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Appellee. Dewitt Rucker, pro se. __________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 5633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rucker-ohio-2012.