State v. Royster

630 S.E.2d 451, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 24, 2006 WL 1050993
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 2, 2006·No. No. 441PA04-2.·Published

Opinion

Defendant's motion for "Petition for Writ of Discretionary Review," which has been treated by this Court as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order:

This case is remanded to the Warren County Superior Court with instructions to: (1) appoint a guardian ad litem, pursuant to G.S. § 1A, Rule 17(b), to represent defendant's interests until such time as the trial court determines he is competent; (2) appoint counsel for defendant; and (3) hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant's pending MAR.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 2nd day of March, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Royster, 630 S.E.2d 451, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 24, 2006 WL 1050993 (N.C. 2006).

630 S.E.2d 451 (State v. Royster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.