State v. Royster

630 S.E.2d 451, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 24, 2006 WL 1050993
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 2, 2006
DocketNo. 441PA04-2.
StatusPublished

This text of 630 S.E.2d 451 (State v. Royster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Royster, 630 S.E.2d 451, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 24, 2006 WL 1050993 (N.C. 2006).

Opinion

Defendant's motion for "Petition for Writ of Discretionary Review," which has been treated by this Court as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order:

This case is remanded to the Warren County Superior Court with instructions to: (1) appoint a guardian ad litem, pursuant to G.S. § 1A, Rule 17(b), to represent defendant's interests until such time as the trial court determines he is competent; (2) appoint counsel for defendant; and (3) hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant's pending MAR.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 2nd day of March, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
630 S.E.2d 451, 2006 N.C. LEXIS 24, 2006 WL 1050993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-royster-nc-2006.