State v. Roy
619 P.2d 648, 47 Or. App. 521, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3209
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 4, 1980·No. No. 10-79-05529, CA 16532·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. He raises a number of assignments of error, only one of which has merit. A portion of a security release questionnaire bearing defendant’s purported signature was admitted into evidence over his objection. Under the rule in State v. Lockwood, 43 Or App 639, 603 P2d 1231 (1980), that ruling was erroneous. However, as was also true in Hartfield, the error was not such as to require reversal in the light of the other evidence.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Roy, 619 P.2d 648, 47 Or. App. 521, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3209 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).
619 P.2d 648 (State v. Roy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Roy
619 P.2d 648 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)