State v. Roy

619 P.2d 648, 47 Or. App. 521, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3209
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 4, 1980
DocketNo. 10-79-05529, CA 16532
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 619 P.2d 648 (State v. Roy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Roy, 619 P.2d 648, 47 Or. App. 521, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3209 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from the judgment on his conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. He raises a number of assignments of error, only one of which has merit. A portion of a security release questionnaire bearing defendant’s purported signature was admitted into evidence over his objection. Under the rule in State v. Lockwood, 43 Or App 639, 603 P2d 1231 (1980), that ruling was erroneous. However, as was also true in Hartfield, the error was not such as to require reversal in the light of the other evidence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Roy
619 P.2d 648 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 P.2d 648, 47 Or. App. 521, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roy-orctapp-1980.