State v. Roy

2011 Ohio 544, 128 Ohio St. 3d 340
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 2011·No. 2010-1877·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s sixth assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roy, 2011 Ohio 544, 128 Ohio St. 3d 340 (Ohio 2011).

2011 Ohio 544 (State v. Roy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Roy
944 N.E.2d 697 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)