State v. Ross

206 P.3d 1103, 227 Or. App. 626, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 291
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 22, 2009·No. CM0021223; A134501·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of seven counts of first-degree rape; one count of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration; five counts of first-degree sodomy; six counts of using a child in a sexually explicit display; and seven counts of first-degree sexual abuse. The trial court imposed consecutive sentence on several of the counts, based on its findings under ORS 137.123. In 10 assignments of error, defendant challenges the trial court’s authority to impose the sentences consecutively in the absence of findings of fact by the jury. We affirm. Oregon v. Ice, 555 US_, 129 S Ct 711, 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ross, 206 P.3d 1103, 227 Or. App. 626, 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 291 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

206 P.3d 1103 (State v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ross
206 P.3d 1103 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)