State v. Ross

318 S.W.3d 770, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1125, 2010 WL 3394473
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 2010·No. WD 70676·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Ross appeals from his conviction after a jury trial of statutory sodomy in the first degree. § 566.062, RSMo. In his sole Point Relied On, Ross claims the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objections to the testimony of two witnesses concerning out-of-court statements made by his minor victim, because the testimony was duplicative and improperly bolstered the victim’s testimony. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ross, 318 S.W.3d 770, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1125, 2010 WL 3394473 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

318 S.W.3d 770 (State v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Evans
318 S.W.3d 770 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)