State v. Ross
Opinion
ORDER
Bobby Ross appeals from his conviction after a jury trial of statutory sodomy in the first degree. § 566.062, RSMo. In his sole Point Relied On, Ross claims the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objections to the testimony of two witnesses concerning out-of-court statements made by his minor victim, because the testimony was duplicative and improperly bolstered the victim’s testimony. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
318 S.W.3d 770 (State v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.