State v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Evans

318 S.W.3d 770, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1120, 2010 WL 3394401

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 31, 2010·No. WD 70118·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mohammed Evans appeals from his conviction for stealing after a jury trial. We find sufficient evidence to support his conviction and affirm. 1 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum ex *771 plaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Two spellings for Mohammed Evans appear in the record on appeal. For consistency purposes, we use the spelling appearing on the trial court's judgment and sentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mohammed Evans appeals from his conviction for stealing after a jury trial. We find sufficient evidence to support his conviction and affirm. 1 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion. However, a memorandum ex *771 plaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Two spellings for Mohammed Evans appear in the record on appeal. For consistency purposes, we use the spelling appearing on the trial court's judgment and sentencing.

State v. Evans, 318 S.W.3d 770, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1120, 2010 WL 3394401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

318 S.W.3d 770 (State v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related