State v. Rosenberg
This text of 2005 Ohio 6510 (State v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. Rosenberg, 107 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2005-Ohio-6510.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROSENBERG, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Rosenberg, 107 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2005-Ohio-6510.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2005-0459 — Submitted October 12, 2005 — Decided December 28, 2005.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 84457, 2005-Ohio-101. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in State v. Cummings, 107 Ohio St.3d 1206, 2005-Ohio-6506, ___ N.E.2d ___, I respectfully dissent. __________________ William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark J. Mahoney, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Thomas Rein, for appellee. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 Ohio 6510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rosenberg-ohio-2005.