State v. . Roper

94 N.C. 858
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.C. 858 (State v. . Roper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Roper, 94 N.C. 858 (N.C. 1886).

Opinion

The defendant was convicted, and there was judgment against him, from which he appealed to this Court. He was required to give a bond of fifty dollars on the appeal. He gave a bond in the sum of fifty dollars, with one John Ingram as surety, who made oath that he "was worth the sum of fifty dollars over and above all exemptions allowed by law, personal and real, and over all his debts and liabilities."

When the case was called for argument in this Court, the Attorney General moved to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the bond or undertaking was not justified by the surety in double the amount specified therein. This has been so repeatedly decided by this Court to be an essential requisite in every undertaking on appeal to this Court, that *Page 717 it is hardly necessary to cite any authority. We therefore refer only to the cases of Turner v. Quinn, 92 N.C. 501, and Anthony v. Carter,91 N.C. 229.

The appeal must be dismissed, and this certified to the Superior Court of Macon County, that the case may be proceeded with according to this opinion and the law.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. . Quinn
92 N.C. 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)
Anthony v. . Carter
91 N.C. 229 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 N.C. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roper-nc-1886.