Anthony v. . Carter

91 N.C. 229
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 5, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 91 N.C. 229 (Anthony v. . Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony v. . Carter, 91 N.C. 229 (N.C. 1884).

Opinion

*231 Ashe, J.

The Code, § 560, declares that “ an undertaking upon an appeal, shall be of no effect unless it be accompanied by the affidavit of one of the sureties that he is worth double the amount specified therein.”

Here, there aré two sureties, and neither justifies in double the amount specified in the undertaking, though each does swear that'he is worth the amount of the undertaking after deducting his exemptions, &c., and the justification of the two is equal to the double the amount of the undertaking. But that is not a compliance with the statute. And the statute is so peremptory that we do not feel at liberty to disregard its express requirements. The court so held in Lytle v. Lytle, 90 N. C , 647. The appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northern Counties Investment Trust v. Hender
41 P. 913 (Washington Supreme Court, 1895)
State v. Roper
94 N.C. 859 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1886)
Halyburton v. . Dobson
65 N.C. 68 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 N.C. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-v-carter-nc-1884.