State v. Ronald Arline

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 27, 2017
DocketA17E0046
StatusPublished

This text of State v. Ronald Arline (State v. Ronald Arline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ronald Arline, (Ga. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 26, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17E0046. THE STATE v. RONALD ARLINE.

The State of Georgia moves, pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b), for an emergency stay of all proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of its appeal in this matter. Under our Rule 40 (b), this Court may exercise its inherent power as may be necessary to preserve jurisdiction of an appeal or to prevent the contested issue from becoming moot. The State shows that Ronald Arline was found guilty by a Dougherty County jury of rape, aggravated child molestation, and child molestation in 2014. The trial court granted Arline’s motion for a new trial in an order filed March 13, 2017, and, the State represents, it has filed a timely notice of appeal from that order. The State contends that the trial court “demonstrated an intent to act beyond its authority and jurisdiction” by considering the grant of bond to Arline. As of the time of this emergency motion, the trial court has not ruled on the issue of Arline’s bond. Thus, any decision by the trial court remains a matter of speculation. Further, the State does not show that the trial court has no jurisdiction to consider the matter of Arline’s bond. The State has not cited to any legal authority in support of its motion, and, in particular, has failed to address OCGA § 5-7-5 (providing, in applicable part, that “[i]n the event the state files an appeal as authorized in this chapter, the accused shall be entitled to be released on reasonable bail pending the disposition of the appeal, except in those cases punishable by death.”). Nor does the State show why a stay of proceedings is necessary to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction over its appeal. The State has not established that the requirements for a Rule 40 (b) motion have been met. Accordingly, the State’s motion is DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/26/2017 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5-7-5
Georgia § 5-7-5

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Ronald Arline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ronald-arline-gactapp-2017.