State v. Rodriquez
637 A.2d 914, 135 N.J. 3, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 171
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion, reported at 264 N.J.Super. 261, 624 A.2d 605 (1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rodriquez, 637 A.2d 914, 135 N.J. 3, 1994 N.J. LEXIS 171 (N.J. 1994).
637 A.2d 914 (State v. Rodriquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DAEVON DAVIS (16-03-0733, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2020
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BENJAMIN CAPERS (09-04-0384 AND 09-04-0385, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017
STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. MARK LOVETT (13-03-0526, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2017
State v. Henderson
27 A.3d 872 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2011)
State v. Janowski
866 A.2d 229 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
State v. Benitez
821 A.2d 547 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
State v. Jones
788 A.2d 303 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
State v. Cherry
674 A.2d 589 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
State v. Rodriquez
637 A.2d 914 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1994)