Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Rodriguez

State v. Rodriguez

40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 915
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 4, 2012
DocketSC 18945
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 40 A.3d 784 (State v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rodriguez, 40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 915 (Colo. 2012).

Opinion

40 A.3d 784 (2012)
304 Conn. 915

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Luis RODRIGUEZ.

SC 18945

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 4, 2012.

Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, and Kelly M. Berwick, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 721, 36 A.3d 724, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in permitting testimony from the attorney for the victim of the defendant's assault?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rodriguez
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014
State v. Rodriguez
58 A.3d 398 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Ocasio
58 A.3d 339 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL
40 A.3d 784 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodriguez-conn-2012.