State v. Rodriguez

40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 915
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 4, 2012·No. SC 18945·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

40 A.3d 784 (2012)
304 Conn. 915

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Luis RODRIGUEZ.

SC 18945

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 4, 2012.

Elizabeth M. Inkster, senior assistant public defender, and Kelly M. Berwick, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Leon F. Dalbec, Jr., senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 721, 36 A.3d 724, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion in permitting testimony from the attorney for the victim of the defendant's assault?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rodriguez, 40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 915 (Colo. 2012).

40 A.3d 784 (State v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rodriguez
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014
State v. Rodriguez
58 A.3d 398 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Ocasio
58 A.3d 339 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL
40 A.3d 784 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)