Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL

State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL

40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 906, 2012 WL 1435481, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 149
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 4, 2012·No. SC 18947·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

40 A.3d 784 (2012)
304 Conn. 906

STATE of Connecticut
v.
CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL.

SC 18947

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided April 4, 2012.

Stephen V. Manning and Donna R. Zito, in support of the petition.

Jane R. Rosenberg and Lynn D. Wittenbrink, assistant attorneys general, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 479, 36 A.3d 252, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the subpoena power conferred upon the claims commissioner by General Statutes § 4-151(c) permits him to subpoena documents from a respondent that has not been named as a party to the suit that the claims commissioner has been asked to authorize?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL, 40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 906, 2012 WL 1435481, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 149 (Colo. 2012).

40 A.3d 784 (State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stenner v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2022
Jim P. Benge, M.D. and Kelsey-Seybold Medical Group PLLC v. Lauren Williams
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Scandariato v. Borrelli
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014
Torres v. Carrese
90 A.3d 256 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2014)
State v. Perez
80 A.3d 103 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Ward v. Ramsey
77 A.3d 935 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Martinez
69 A.3d 975 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
E & M Custom Homes, LLC v. Negron
59 A.3d 262 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Rodriguez
40 A.3d 784 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)