State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL
This text of 40 A.3d 784 (State v. CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
CHARLOTTE HUNGERFORD HOSPITAL.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Stephen V. Manning and Donna R. Zito, in support of the petition.
Jane R. Rosenberg and Lynn D. Wittenbrink, assistant attorneys general, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 479, 36 A.3d 252, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the subpoena power conferred upon the claims commissioner by General Statutes § 4-151(c) permits him to subpoena documents from a respondent that has not been named as a party to the suit that the claims commissioner has been asked to authorize?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.3d 784, 304 Conn. 906, 2012 WL 1435481, 2012 Conn. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-charlotte-hungerford-hospital-conn-2012.