State v. Robinson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

State v. Robinson

337 S.E.2d 204, 287 S.C. 173, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 514

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 9, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 337 S.E.2d 204 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robinson, 337 S.E.2d 204, 287 S.C. 173, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 514 (S.C. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent seeks to dismiss this appeal on the basis that it is premature. The motion is granted.

Appellant was tried and convicted in absentia of unlawful use of the telephone. His counsel filed notice of intent to appeal the conviction. Appellant has not been apprehended since the trial, and the sentence remains sealed.

A criminal defendant may not appeal until final judgment. State v. Hubbard, 277 S. C. 568, 290 S. E. (2d) 817 (1982). Judgment in a criminal case is not final until sentence is imposed. Ex parte Murray, 261 S. C. 255, 199 S. E. (2d) 718 (1973); State v. McKettrick, 13 S. C. 439 (1880).

Since the sealed sentence has not been opened and read to appellant, there is no final judgment from which appeal may be taken. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to appellant’s right to raise *174 these issues on timely appeal. State v. Hightower, 33 S. C. 598, 11 S. E. 579 (1890); Ex parte Tolson, 36 S.C.L. (5 Strob.) 88 (1850).

The case of State v. Adams, 268 S. C. 97, 232 S. E. (2d) 28 (1977) may be read to authorize appeal in this case. To the extent it is inconsistent with the views expressed herein, it is expressly overruled.

This order shall be published with the opinions of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI