Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/State v. Hubbard

State v. Hubbard

290 S.E.2d 817, 277 S.C. 568, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 14, 1982·No. 21695·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appellants are charged with gambling and operating a gambling house. Before the jury was sworn, the appellants moved to suppress evidence seized in a search of the premises where they were arrested. This appeal is from the denial of that motion. We dismiss the appeal.

The appellants have not yet gone to trial. An appeal in a criminal case must attend the final judgment rendered on the indictment. State v. McMillan, 189 S. C. 444, 1 S. E. (2d) 626 (1939). No final judgment has occurred in this case and the order appealed from is interlocutory. State v. Thomas, 275 S. C. 274, 269 S. E. (2d) 768 (1980).

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal and remand the case for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hubbard, 290 S.E.2d 817, 277 S.C. 568, 1982 S.C. LEXIS 320 (S.C. 1982).

290 S.E.2d 817 (State v. Hubbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ryan L. Manigo (2)
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2026
State v. Reece
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018
State v. Looper
772 S.E.2d 516 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2015)
State v. Isaac
747 S.E.2d 677 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2013)
State v. Miller
346 S.E.2d 705 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
Parsons v. State
347 S.E.2d 504 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
State v. Robinson
337 S.E.2d 204 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1985)