State v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Robinson

550 P.2d 758, 25 Or. App. 675

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 14, 1976

Docket75-1044, CA 5195

StatusPublished

Cited by23 cases

This text of 550 P.2d 758 (State v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robinson, 550 P.2d 758, 25 Or. App. 675 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, having been convicted of murder upon trial by jury, contends on appeal that his trial counsel was incompetent. This issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. See, Turner v. Cupp, 1 Or App 596, 465 P2d 249 (1970). This is not one of those rare instances.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, having been convicted of murder upon trial by jury, contends on appeal that his trial counsel was incompetent. This issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. See, Turner v. Cupp, 1 Or App 596, 465 P2d 249 (1970). This is not one of those rare instances.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

550 P.2d 758, 25 Or. App. 675, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robinson-orctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack