State v. Robinson
550 P.2d 758, 25 Or. App. 675
Opinion
Defendant, having been convicted of murder upon trial by jury, contends on appeal that his trial counsel was incompetent. This issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. See, Turner v. Cupp, 1 Or App 596, 465 P2d 249 (1970). This is not one of those rare instances.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Robinson, 550 P.2d 758, 25 Or. App. 675 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
550 P.2d 758 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirk-miles v. Myers
D. Oregon, 2025
Clegg v. Premo
D. Oregon, 2024
Tolle v. Bowser
D. Oregon, 2024
Davis v. Miller
D. Oregon, 2024
Smith v. Oregon Department of Corrections
D. Oregon, 2022
Smith v. Brown
D. Oregon, 2021
Smith v. Amsbery
D. Oregon, 2021
Gannon v. Bowser
D. Oregon, 2021
Petterson v. Wilson
D. Oregon, 2020
Graybill v. Cain
D. Oregon, 2020
David Decker v. Rob Persson
663 F. App'x 520 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Matthew Sexton v. Mike Cozner
Ninth Circuit, 2012
State v. Neighbors
640 P.2d 643 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982)
State v. Chase
624 P.2d 1100 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)
State v. Howard
621 P.2d 92 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
State v. Bateman
616 P.2d 1206 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
State v. Henley
569 P.2d 58 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
State v. Sweet
566 P.2d 199 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
State v. Grant
550 P.2d 444 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976)