State v. Henley
569 P.2d 58, 31 Or. App. 109, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1891
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 4, 1977
Docket20588, CA 8336
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases
This text of 569 P.2d 58 (State v. Henley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Henley, 569 P.2d 58, 31 Or. App. 109, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1891 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).
Opinion
The thrust of defendant’s assignment of error in this case is incompetent performance by his trial counsel. As we noted in State v. Robinson, 25 Or App 675, 550 P2d 758 (1976), this issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. This is not one of those instances.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Windress
752 P.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
State v. Chase
624 P.2d 1100 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)
State v. Howard
621 P.2d 92 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
State v. Bateman
616 P.2d 1206 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
State v. Cardwell
615 P.2d 1198 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1980)
State v. Durham
569 P.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
State v. Myhrvold
569 P.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
569 P.2d 58, 31 Or. App. 109, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henley-orctapp-1977.