State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

538 S.W.3d 375

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 30, 2018·No. WD 79601·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Daniel Roberts appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, by the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and two counts of child molestation in the first degree. On appeal, Mr. Roberts argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence testimony regarding uncharged bad acts resulting in prejudice. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Daniel Roberts appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, by the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and two counts of child molestation in the first degree. On appeal, Mr. Roberts argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence testimony regarding uncharged bad acts resulting in prejudice. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Roberts, 538 S.W.3d 375 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

538 S.W.3d 375 (State v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.