State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

538 S.W.3d 375

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 2018

DocketWD 79601

StatusPublished

This text of 538 S.W.3d 375 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roberts, 538 S.W.3d 375 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Daniel Roberts appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, by the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and two counts of child molestation in the first degree. On appeal, Mr. Roberts argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence testimony regarding uncharged bad acts resulting in prejudice. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Daniel Roberts appeals from his judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, by the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Missouri, of two counts of statutory sodomy in the first degree and two counts of child molestation in the first degree. On appeal, Mr. Roberts argues that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting into evidence testimony regarding uncharged bad acts resulting in prejudice. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 S.W.3d 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-moctapp-2018.