State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

534 S.W.3d 424

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 12, 2017

DocketWD 79688

StatusPublished

This text of 534 S.W.3d 424 (State v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roberts, 534 S.W.3d 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Ray County, Bruce Roberts was convicted of sexual abuse in violation of § 566.100, RSMo. He was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. Roberts appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial based on the State’s late disclosure of the recording of a 9-1-1 call made by the State’s principal witness. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Ray County, Bruce Roberts was convicted of sexual abuse in violation of § 566.100, RSMo. He was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. Roberts appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial based on the State’s late disclosure of the recording of a 9-1-1 call made by the State’s principal witness. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 S.W.3d 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberts-moctapp-2017.