State v. Roberts

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberts

534 S.W.3d 424

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 12, 2017·No. WD 79688·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Ray County, Bruce Roberts was convicted of sexual abuse in violation of § 566.100, RSMo. He was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. Roberts appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial based on the State’s late disclosure of the recording of a 9-1-1 call made by the State’s principal witness. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Ray County, Bruce Roberts was convicted of sexual abuse in violation of § 566.100, RSMo. He was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. Roberts appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial based on the State’s late disclosure of the recording of a 9-1-1 call made by the State’s principal witness. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Roberts, 534 S.W.3d 424 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

534 S.W.3d 424 (State v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.