State v. Roberson

241 S.W.3d 841, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1767, 2007 WL 4530822
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Roberson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 35
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2007·No. ED 89096·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Roberson (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction of one count of first-degree murder and one count of armed criminal action. Defendant argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence and it abused its discretion in admitting certain evidence. Defendant also argues the trial court erred and abused its discretion in excluding Ruthie Williams’s (“Williams”) testimony from the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roberson, 241 S.W.3d 841, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1767, 2007 WL 4530822 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

241 S.W.3d 841 (State v. Roberson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gruenert v. Green Park Nursing Home
241 S.W.3d 841 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)