State v. Roberson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Roberson

182 S.W.3d 771, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 118, 2006 WL 222827

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 2006

DocketWD 64986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 S.W.3d 771 (State v. Roberson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Roberson, 182 S.W.3d 771, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 118, 2006 WL 222827 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tammy Lynn Roberson appeals her conviction of the class B felony of Burglary in *772 the First Degree, section 569.160, RSMo 2000. She does not appeal her misdemeanor conviction of False Imprisonment, section 565.130, RSMo 2000. She was sentenced to fifteen years in the custody of the Department of Corrections for the burglary conviction and to one year in the county jail for the misdemeanor conviction. Ms. Roberson contends that the trial court violated her right to due process of law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Missouri Constitution by failing to grant her motion for judgment of acquittal as to count one, first-degree burglary, because insufficient evidence was presented to find that she committed every element of the offense as a principal, as charged.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tammy Lynn Roberson appeals her conviction of the class B felony of Burglary in *772 the First Degree, section 569.160, RSMo 2000. She does not appeal her misdemeanor conviction of False Imprisonment, section 565.130, RSMo 2000. She was sentenced to fifteen years in the custody of the Department of Corrections for the burglary conviction and to one year in the county jail for the misdemeanor conviction. Ms. Roberson contends that the trial court violated her right to due process of law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10 of the Missouri Constitution by failing to grant her motion for judgment of acquittal as to count one, first-degree burglary, because insufficient evidence was presented to find that she committed every element of the offense as a principal, as charged.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 S.W.3d 771, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 118, 2006 WL 222827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roberson-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack