State v. Robbins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Robbins

481 S.W.2d 618, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 937

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 8, 1972

DocketNo. 9148

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 481 S.W.2d 618 (State v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Robbins, 481 S.W.2d 618, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 937 (Mo. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Deja vu.

Defendant was charged with the second offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. § 564.440 RSMo 1969, V.A. M.S. The jury returned a verdict April 9, 1971, finding defendant guilty and assessed his punishment at 15 days in the county jail. A motion for new trial was filed April 21, 1971, and the transcript on appeal contains the following unlabeled notation: “June 7, 1971. Hearing held on Defendant’s Motion for New Trial and the same is overruled. Defendant formally sentenced to fifteen days in County Jail. Notice of Appeal filed.”

The record does not disclose that defendant was ever afforded allocution or that the court rendered “the proper judgment and pronounce[d] sentence thereon.” Crim.Rule 27.09, V.A.M.R. As no final judgment was rendered against defendant, there is nothing from which an appeal can be taken. State v. Chase, Mo., 415 S.W.2d 731, 732(1-3). The appeal is premature and is, therefore, ordered dismissed and the cause is remanded to the circuit court from whence it came. Provided proper procedures are performed after remand, defendant may then appeal. State v. Stanley, Mo.App., 473 S.W.2d 805; State v. Gilbert, Mo.App., 472 S.W.2d 877-878, and the many cases therein cited.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Deja vu.

Defendant was charged with the second offense of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. § 564.440 RSMo 1969, V.A. M.S. The jury returned a verdict April 9, 1971, finding defendant guilty and assessed his punishment at 15 days in the county jail. A motion for new trial was filed April 21, 1971, and the transcript on appeal contains the following unlabeled notation: “June 7, 1971. Hearing held on Defendant’s Motion for New Trial and the same is overruled. Defendant formally sentenced to fifteen days in County Jail. Notice of Appeal filed.”

The record does not disclose that defendant was ever afforded allocution or that the court rendered “the proper judgment and pronounce[d] sentence thereon.” Crim.Rule 27.09, V.A.M.R. As no final judgment was rendered against defendant, there is nothing from which an appeal can be taken. State v. Chase, Mo., 415 S.W.2d 731, 732(1-3). The appeal is premature and is, therefore, ordered dismissed and the cause is remanded to the circuit court from whence it came. Provided proper procedures are performed after remand, defendant may then appeal. State v. Stanley, Mo.App., 473 S.W.2d 805; State v. Gilbert, Mo.App., 472 S.W.2d 877-878, and the many cases therein cited.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 S.W.2d 618, 1972 Mo. App. LEXIS 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-robbins-moctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack