State v. Gilbert
This text of 507 S.W.2d 25 (State v. Gilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On June 5, 1973, a jury in the Circuit Court of Phelps County found defendant guilty of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Two days later, or on June 7, 1973, defendant’s motion for a new trial was filed. The next entry in the transcript on appeal is the undated assertion that “Thereafter, motion for new trial not being argued by counsel, it is automatically overruled by law.”1 Defendant’s notice of appeal to this court was filed September 6, 1973.
The transcript on appeal, which came to this court on February 25, 1974, is devoid of any record which shows that defendant was ever afforded allocution or that the court rendered “the proper judgment and pronounce [d] sentence thereon.” Rule 27.-09, V.A.M.R. Since no final judgment was rendered against defendant, there is nothing from which an appeal can be taken. State v. Chase, 415 S.W.2d 731, 732[l-3] (Mo.1967). Ergo, the appeal is premature and is ordered dismissed. [26]*26Should proper procedures be performed after remand, defendant may then appeal. State v. Robbins, 481 S.W.2d 618 (Mo.App.1972).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
507 S.W.2d 25, 1974 Mo. App. LEXIS 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gilbert-moctapp-1974.