State v. R.L.B.
This text of 575 So. 2d 651 (State v. R.L.B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The State of Florida petitions this Court to review R.L.B. v. State, 562 So.2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), in which the Third District Court of Appeal reduced the trial court’s finding of delinquency from third-degree grand theft to the lesser offense of trespass to a conveyance, relying on the “controlling and indistinguishable authority of G.C. v. State, 560 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).” 562 So.2d at 739. The district court also certified conflict with D.N. v. State, 529 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA), review dismissed, 537 So.2d 568 (Fla.1988).1
We recently resolved the conflict by our decision in State v. G.C., 572 So.2d 1380 (Fla.1991), which approved the Third District Court of Appeal’s decision in G.C. v. State. Because we have resolved the conflict in a manner consistent with this case, the petition for review is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
575 So. 2d 651, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 196, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 350, 1991 WL 25368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rlb-fla-1991.