R.L.B. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

R.L.B. v. State

562 So. 2d 739, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3139, 1990 WL 58270

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1990·No. No. 89-1180·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER curiam:

Based on the controlling and indistinguishable authority of G.C. v. State, 560 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (rehearing denied, opinion filed April 24, 1990), and D.M. v. State, 558 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), we affirm the adjudication of delinquency under review, but reduce the finding of delinquency from third-degree grand theft (§ 812.014(1), (2)(c), (4), Fla.Stat. (1987)), to the lesser offense of trespass to á conveyance (§ 810.08(1), Fla.Stat. (1987)). We certify that our decision herein conflicts with D.N. v. State, 529 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 537 So.2d 568 (Fla.1988).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER curiam:

Based on the controlling and indistinguishable authority of G.C. v. State, 560 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (rehearing denied, opinion filed April 24, 1990), and D.M. v. State, 558 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), we affirm the adjudication of delinquency under review, but reduce the finding of delinquency from third-degree grand theft (§ 812.014(1), (2)(c), (4), Fla.Stat. (1987)), to the lesser offense of trespass to á conveyance (§ 810.08(1), Fla.Stat. (1987)). We certify that our decision herein conflicts with D.N. v. State, 529 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 537 So.2d 568 (Fla.1988).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

R.L.B. v. State, 562 So. 2d 739, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3139, 1990 WL 58270 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

562 So. 2d 739 (R.L.B. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related