State v. Rice
This text of 372 A.2d 349 (State v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
LUMAS A. RICE, DEFENDANT, AND INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LYNCH, MILMED and ANTELL.
Mr. Vincent N. Macri argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Gold and Macri, attorneys; Mr. Jack Gold on the brief).
Mr. Frank A. Tunnero argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Francis Patrick McQuade, Essex County Counsel, attorney; Mr. Richard M. Cignarella, First Assistant County Counsel, on the statement in lieu of brief).
PER CURIAM.
The order under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Scalera in his opinion of November 24, 1975, 137 N.J. Super. 593 (Cty. Ct. 1975).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
372 A.2d 349, 148 N.J. Super. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rice-njsuperctappdiv-1977.