State v. Rice

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rice

559 S.W.3d 115

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 16, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105719

StatusPublished

This text of 559 S.W.3d 115 (State v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rice, 559 S.W.3d 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Rommel Rice appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a request for adjournment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Rommel Rice appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a request for adjournment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 S.W.3d 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rice-moctapp-2018.