State v. Rice

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rice

559 S.W.3d 115

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2018·No. No. ED 105719·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Rommel Rice appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a request for adjournment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan Rommel Rice appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury trial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing a request for adjournment. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Rice, 559 S.W.3d 115 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

559 S.W.3d 115 (State v. Rice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.