State v. Rice

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rice

472 S.W.3d 269, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1057, 2015 WL 6160924

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 20, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101222

StatusPublished

This text of 472 S.W.3d 269 (State v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rice, 472 S.W.3d 269, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1057, 2015 WL 6160924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Robert Rice, appeals the judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury convicted him of two counts of second-degree statutory rape, in violation of section 566.034 RSMo. (2000 & Supp. 2014), and two counts of incest, in violation of section 568.020 RSMo. (Supp. 2014). The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior and persistent offender to 15 years of imprisonment for each count of statutory rape, to be served concurrently. The trial court sentenced the defendant to seven years of imprisonment for each count of incest, to be served concurrently to one another but consecutively to the statutory-rape sentences, for a total of 22 years of imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

Am opinion would have no precedential value. • The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The defendant, Robert Rice, appeals the judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury convicted him of two counts of second-degree statutory rape, in violation of section 566.034 RSMo. (2000 & Supp. 2014), and two counts of incest, in violation of section 568.020 RSMo. (Supp. 2014). The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior and persistent offender to 15 years of imprisonment for each count of statutory rape, to be served concurrently. The trial court sentenced the defendant to seven years of imprisonment for each count of incest, to be served concurrently to one another but consecutively to the statutory-rape sentences, for a total of 22 years of imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.

Am opinion would have no precedential value. • The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 S.W.3d 269, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1057, 2015 WL 6160924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rice-moctapp-2015.