State v. Rhodes
This text of 198 S.W.3d 206 (State v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order
Ronnie Rhodes appeals his conviction of second-degree burglary. Rhodes’ sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred *207 in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, in entering a judgment of conviction for second-degree burglary, and in sentencing him for second-degree burglary because the State’s evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for second-degree burglary, in that the State’s evidence did not show beyond a reasonable doubt that he actually knew that it was unlawful for him to be in the classroom and conference room portions of a building open to the public.
Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 S.W.3d 206, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2006 WL 2358072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rhodes-moctapp-2006.