State v. Rhodes

198 S.W.3d 206, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2006 WL 2358072
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 15, 2006·No. WD 65786·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie Rhodes appeals his conviction of second-degree burglary. Rhodes’ sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred *207 in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, in entering a judgment of conviction for second-degree burglary, and in sentencing him for second-degree burglary because the State’s evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for second-degree burglary, in that the State’s evidence did not show beyond a reasonable doubt that he actually knew that it was unlawful for him to be in the classroom and conference room portions of a building open to the public.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rhodes, 198 S.W.3d 206, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 2006 WL 2358072 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

198 S.W.3d 206 (State v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Wentzville v. Lindemann
198 S.W.3d 206 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)