City of Wentzville v. Lindemann

Missouri Court of Appeals

City of Wentzville v. Lindemann

198 S.W.3d 206, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1214, 2006 WL 2347743

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 15, 2006·No. ED 87331·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The homeowners, Robert and Susan Lindemann, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, which, as a discovery sanction, dismissed their exceptions and pleadings filed in the City of Wentzville’s condemnation action against a portion of their property. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The homeowners, Robert and Susan Lindemann, appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, which, as a discovery sanction, dismissed their exceptions and pleadings filed in the City of Wentzville’s condemnation action against a portion of their property. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

City of Wentzville v. Lindemann, 198 S.W.3d 206, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1214, 2006 WL 2347743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

198 S.W.3d 206 (City of Wentzville v. Lindemann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related