State v. Rhoads
29 Ohio St. 171
Opinion
The court below erred in allowing the opinions of the witness to be given in evidence. It was for the jury to determine whether or not the defendant was in danger, from the facts and circumstances attending and •surrounding the alleged assault, and not from the opinions of eye-witnesses of the transaction.
This case is distinguishable from Stewart v. The State, 19 Ohio, 302.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rhoads, 29 Ohio St. 171 (Ohio 1876).
29 Ohio St. 171 (State v. Rhoads) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Jones
65 N.E.2d 422 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Majors v. State
83 Miss. 439 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1903)
State v. Crittenden
38 La. Ann. 448 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1886)
Railroad Co. v. Schultz
43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 270 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)