Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Reigle

State v. Reigle

261 P.3d 96, 245 Or. App. 503
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 8, 2011
DocketCRH080530 A144146
StatusPublished

This text of 261 P.3d 96 (State v. Reigle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Reigle, 261 P.3d 96, 245 Or. App. 503 (Or. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

261 P.3d 96 (2011)
245 Or. App. 503

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
David Alan REIGLE, Defendant-Appellant.

CRH080530; A144146.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted August 2, 2011.
Decided September 8, 2011.

Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Jedediah Peterson, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Machuca, 347 Or. 644, 227 P.3d 729 (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. MacHuca
227 P.3d 729 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Reigle
261 P.3d 96 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 P.3d 96, 245 Or. App. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reigle-orctapp-2011.