State v. Reid

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Reid

338 So. 2d 291, 1976 La. LEXIS 5280

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 21, 1976

DocketNo. 58784

StatusPublished

This text of 338 So. 2d 291 (State v. Reid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reid, 338 So. 2d 291, 1976 La. LEXIS 5280 (La. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Henry A. Reid, Jr. applying for Supervisory Review.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable L. E. Hawsey, Jr., Judge of the 14th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Calcasieu to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 27th day of October 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 27th day of October, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Henry A. Reid, Jr. applying for Supervisory Review.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable L. E. Hawsey, Jr., Judge of the 14th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Calcasieu to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 27th day of October 1976, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 27th day of October, 1976, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 So. 2d 291, 1976 La. LEXIS 5280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reid-la-1976.