State v. Reed

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Reed

2022 Ohio 1327, 194 N.E.3d 349, 167 Ohio St. 3d 481

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 26, 2022

Docket2020-1337

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2022 Ohio 1327 (State v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Reed, 2022 Ohio 1327, 194 N.E.3d 349, 167 Ohio St. 3d 481 (Ohio 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Reed, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1327.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-1327 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. REED, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Reed, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1327.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed, and cause remanded to trial court to consider appellant’s motion for leave to file delayed motion for new trial in light of State v. Bethel. (No. 2020-1337―Submitted April 12, 2022―Decided April 26, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 28442, 2020-Ohio-3574. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court to consider appellant Rashaan O. Reed’s motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial in light of State v. Bethel, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-783, __ N.E.3d __. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

_________________ Mathias H. Heck, Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew T. French, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Keating Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L., Michael T. Cappel, and Paul R. Kerridge, for appellant. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Reed, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1327.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-1327 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. REED, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Reed, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-1327.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed, and cause remanded to trial court to consider appellant’s motion for leave to file delayed motion for new trial in light of State v. Bethel. (No. 2020-1337―Submitted April 12, 2022―Decided April 26, 2022.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 28442, 2020-Ohio-3574. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court to consider appellant Rashaan O. Reed’s motion for leave to file a delayed motion for a new trial in light of State v. Bethel, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-783, __ N.E.3d __. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

_________________ Mathias H. Heck, Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew T. French, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Keating Muething & Klekamp, P.L.L., Michael T. Cappel, and Paul R. Kerridge, for appellant. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2022 Ohio 1327, 194 N.E.3d 349, 167 Ohio St. 3d 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-reed-ohio-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack