Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Reed

State v. Reed

895 S.W.2d 641, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 642, 1995 WL 128525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Reed. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 716 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1995·No. No. 66217·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by the court of the class A misdemeanor of harassment, § 565.090 RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. A written opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Reed, 895 S.W.2d 641, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 642, 1995 WL 128525 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

895 S.W.2d 641 (State v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.