State v. Reed

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Reed

831 S.W.2d 763, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 841, 1992 WL 103039

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Reed. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 754 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 19, 1992·No. No. 60136·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of attempted robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action and property damage. We affirm. The trial court committed no error, plain or otherwise, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of attempted robbery in the first degree, armed criminal action and property damage. We affirm. The trial court committed no error, plain or otherwise, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Reed, 831 S.W.2d 763, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 841, 1992 WL 103039 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

831 S.W.2d 763 (State v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.