State v. Ray

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ray

112 S.W.3d 448, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 2003 WL 21910859

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Ray. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1474 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 12, 2003·No. No. ED 80760·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Orlando Ray, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the first degree, three counts of assault in the second degree and three counts of armed criminal action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Orlando Ray, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the first degree, three counts of assault in the second degree and three counts of armed criminal action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Ray, 112 S.W.3d 448, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1271, 2003 WL 21910859 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

112 S.W.3d 448 (State v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.