State v. Ray

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ray

93 S.W.3d 807, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2476, 2002 WL 31863811

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 24, 2002

DocketED 79581

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.W.3d 807 (State v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ray, 93 S.W.3d 807, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2476, 2002 WL 31863811 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211 RSMo (1994). The trial court found her to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced her to ten years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*808 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211 RSMo (1994). The trial court found her to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced her to ten years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

*808 The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.W.3d 807, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2476, 2002 WL 31863811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ray-moctapp-2002.