State v. Randolph
This text of 139 S.W.3d 179 (State v. Randolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Daniel B. RANDOLPH, Appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Kim Searfoss, Boonville, for Appellant.
Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Andrea Kaye Spillars, Leslie McNamara, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.
Before PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge, RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge, and LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.
Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 27, 2004.
ORDER
Daniel Randolph appeals the circuit court's judgment convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 S.W.3d 179, 2004 WL 1191055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-randolph-moctapp-2004.