State v. Randolph

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Randolph

104 S.W.3d 418, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 617, 2003 WL 1961346

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 2003·No. No. ED 80997·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of twelve counts of criminal non-support, in violation of Section 568.040 RSMo 1994, on which she was sentenced to four years imprisonment and assessed a fine of $100.00 on each of the twelve counts.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of twelve counts of criminal non-support, in violation of Section 568.040 RSMo 1994, on which she was sentenced to four years imprisonment and assessed a fine of $100.00 on each of the twelve counts.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Randolph, 104 S.W.3d 418, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 617, 2003 WL 1961346 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

104 S.W.3d 418 (State v. Randolph) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.