State v. Randell

329 S.W.3d 398, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1643, 2010 WL 4723751
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 2010·No. ED 93545·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chrystal Randell appeals from a judgment of conviction for second-degree felony robbery, in violation of Section 569.030 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b)(2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Randell, 329 S.W.3d 398, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1643, 2010 WL 4723751 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

329 S.W.3d 398 (State v. Randell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McCombs
329 S.W.3d 398 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)